If you visit a Zionist Hate Museum, you will find pure Fraud and Avoidance of the truth.
Of course, it is all set up to Hate The Germans avoiding anything good about National Socialism. Let’s have a look at their promotions, shall we?
Nazi Assault—1933 to 1939
Never mentioned (of course) is the miraculous escape from the Great Depression (against all odds) of the German People. Instead, it is called an assault. The fact that Germany was pretty much destroyed after WWI is negated. Also negated is the split of Germany in two by a Corridor owned by Poland. It is negated “Judea Declares War on Germany” as it is negated the Balfour Declaration which stole Victory in WWI from Germany, causing the need and desire for a Leader like Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist Workers Party. It is negated that with the Balfour Declaration, the Zionists specifically “Stabbed Germany in the Back”. The Zionists having control of the War Factories, and the Media, and the Banking Structure in Germany had effectively committed Treason against their German Comrades. They had since turned Berlin into a “Den of Inequity” with Porn Shops and Modern Art (pornographic) and a Sex Trade unmatched anywhere in the World. All the while the Germans had to pay “Reparations” for the War, which the Zionists (in effect) started themselves. All of this is negated. However, once Adolf Hitler got into power, the National Socialists began to rebuild the economy, causing the…
The “Final Solution”—1940 to 1945
The Zionists put their “Own Meaning” on to this term. In fact, it was all about the deportation of people not loyal to the Realm. People who did not wish to help with the German Economy, or be a part of the German People. It wasn’t as if they had to become Christian or National Socialists. No. In fact, they just needed to be in favor of the German Reich and not be working against it. If they were a threat to the Reich or openly against the Reich, they would be rounded up and deported. This did not just apply to a singular race or religion. It applied to anyone.
As for the Zionists (and Jews sympathetic to the Zionist cause) the “Transfer Agreement” was negotiated, as a reply to the Zionist Worldwide Boycott of German Goods.
The centerpiece of German-Zionist cooperation during the Hitler era was the Transfer Agreement, a pact that enabled tens of thousands of German Jews to migrate to Palestine with their wealth. The Agreement, also known as the Haavara (Hebrew for “transfer”), was concluded in August 1933 following talks between German officials and Chaim Arlosoroff, Political Secretary of the Jewish Agency, the Palestine center of the World Zionist Organization.
Through this unusual arrangement, each Jew bound for Palestine deposited money in a special account in Germany. The money was used to purchase German-made agricultural tools, building materials, pumps, fertilizer, and so forth, which were exported to Palestine and sold there by the Jewish-owned Haavara company in Tel-Aviv. Money from the sales was given to the Jewish emigrant upon his arrival in Palestine in an amount corresponding to his deposit in Germany. German goods poured into Palestine through the Haavara, which was supplemented a short time later with a barter agreement by which Palestine oranges were exchanged for German timber, automobiles, agricultural machinery, and other goods. The Agreement thus served the Zionist aim of bringing Jewish settlers and development capital to Palestine, while simultaneously serving the German goal of freeing the country of an unwanted alien group.
The inspiration for the Transfer Agreement was a private initiative proposed by Sam Cohen, owner of the Hanotea citrus-export company in Netanya. Cohen negotiated directly with the German Economics Ministry, which agreed to allow Jews considering leaving Germany to deposit money, up to 50,000 Reichsmarks per family, into one of two different accounts in the Reichsbank. That money would then be used to purchase and export to Palestine agricultural equipment produced in Germany and needed by Hanotea. When they arrived in the Land of Israel, the Jews would be reimbursed by the company in local currency. The arrangement also allowed each departing Jew to take up to 1,000 pounds sterling.
It was something of a win-win scheme. On July 18, Cohen and the Germans renegotiated it upward, so that it covered a total of 3 million Reichsmarks, in place of the original 1 million.
So the Zionists left (mostly) and all that was left was:
The remaining Jews who did not wish to become Zionist and move to Palestine and were highly suspect (yes) but many did back the Reich and they were not set for deportation. Communists, Bolsheviks, and other threats to National Socialism were to be deported. Many plans were made for this deportation. Yet the Zionists like to concentrate on the Jews and pretend that they cared for them, even though the Jews left in Germany chose NOT to become Zionist and move to Palestine.
There exists no document establishing the reality of the “plan to exterminate” the Jews, so that “it is difficult to say how, when, and exactly by whom the order to exterminate the Jews was given.”
Such is the most recent conclusion of Exterminationist historiography.
From 29 June to 2 July 1982, the School of Higher Studies in Social Sciences and the Sorbonne organized, in Paris, an important international conference on the theme: “Nazi Germany and the Extermination of the Jews.”
In the introductory report, titled “The historiographical debate on Nazi anti-Semitism and the extermination of the Jews,” Saul Friedländer adduced in evidence the presence of two fundamental tendencies of the most recent historiography in regard to the genesis and development of the Extermination” of the Jews. 
The first is the thesis of the continuity “that established right from the start a cause-and-effect relationship between Nazi ideology since its origins, in particular, that of Hitler and the annihilation of the Jews.”  The other is the idea of discontinuity that implies “a certain anarchy at the level of the decision-making centers, that restores to certainly responsible subalterns of the Nazi hierarchy their importance and eliminates, in part, the idea of one supremely responsible man, Hitler, in that which concerns the Jewish policy.”  Not only are these two interpretations contradictory, but indeed both are without foundation. 
Neither the thesis of inexorable continuity and of planning the total extermination of the Jews before the attack on the USSR, nor that of discontinuity and improvisation can be demonstrated in reality, in view of the present state of the sources; such is the condusion reached by Krausnick and Wilhelm at the end of their monumental study of the Einsatzgruppen. 
At the end of his report Saul Friedländer traces a “framework of the acquisitions of [Exterminationist] historiography” in which, regarding the extermination of the Jews, he admits:
The question of the date on which the total physical extermination of the Jews was decided, as well as the elaboration of the plan for the “final solution” remain unresolved. 
These “acquisitions” have been fully confirmed in the presentations of two other historians.
Uwe Dietrich Adam in his account “Nazi measures regarding the Jews from the start of the Second World War up to the German attack against the USSR,” declared:
However, the precise date at which this “final solutions was ordained constitutes a problem not yet resolved for German and for world history. 
Insofar as no one has yet discovered a written trace of this order [to liquidate the Jews under German control] in the sources which have been exploited up to the present, and insofar as that seems unlikely, it is incumbent on the historian to date it as precisely as possible by appealing to interpretation. Since the methods and the hypotheses on this subject are very numerous, we find ourselves confronted with very diverse opinions. 
In his account “The decision concerning the final solutions” Christopher R. Browning spoke of “essential divergences” among Exterminationist historians:
The decision concerning the final solution has been the object of a large number of historical interpretations. The essential divergences seem to involve two connected questions: on the one hand, the nature of the decision process and, more particularly, the role of Hitler and his ideology; on the other hand, the moment when the decision was made. As Martin Broszat rightly remarked, so great a variety of interpretations warns us that every theory on the origin of the final solution is in the domain of probability rather than of certitude.
Yet as you can tell, Zionist Museums of Hate NEVER mention any of this.
They make it out to be that the “Final Solution” meant Genocide. Which it did not, and they have absolutely NO DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE which is verified or admitted and not being a forgery, or a misrepresentation to show such a “Fairy Tale”.
Yet for some reason, THEY cannot show these murdered numbers from camps. There is no documentation to back it up whatsoever, except for Camp Records, International Red Cross figures and British broken codes of the Enigma Machine records, which all put the figures (pertaining to Jews) to be (at most) 280,000 for ALL CAMPS with the German Records being far more detailed, and the only ones differentiating people who died from Old Age and Disease, from the very few actually executed in camps.
As for the “Term” Holocaust, it is a term not really promoted until the 1970’s and all former references to the term were Zionist. The word itself is of Greek origins: holos is “completely” and kaustos is “sacrificial offering.” It had largely been used to refer to massive destructions by fire, most prominently in the title of a dystopian 1844 short story by Nathaniel Hawthorne, “Earth’s Holocaust,” in which all the world’s literature and the artwork is deliberately burned. It’s origin from the:
The Holocaust was the state-sponsored, systematic persecution and annihilation of European Jewry by Nazi Germany and its collaborators between 1933 and 1945.
So all Jews are dead now?
Jews were the primary victims—six million were murdered;
This would be, what? The 141st such claim of Zionists?
Gypsies, the handicapped and Poles were also targeted for destruction or decimation for racial, ethnic, or national reasons. Millions more, including homosexuals, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Soviet prisoners of war and political dissidents, also suffered grievous oppression and death under Nazi tyranny.
Yet the Holocaust Museum of Hate claims no reparations for them. Just Zionists.
The Museum’s primary mission is to advance and disseminate knowledge about this unprecedented tragedy; to preserve the memory of those who suffered, and to encourage its visitors to reflect upon the moral and spiritual questions raised by the events of the Holocaust as well as their own responsibilities as citizens of a democracy.
Don’t believe me? Read it yourself:
So to heck with Hate Speech…
Zionists build Museums to it, and they promote it every day on Mainstream Media and they Lobby Government to repeat their “Fairy Stories” and that is ok.
Yet this most recent suppression of Alex Jones by the entities (Zionist Owned) like YouTube and Spotify and Facebook etc. are just preludes to more destruction of freedom of speech, in favor of them pushing openly their falsehoods and Fairy Tales where they pit human against human, race against race, truth taking a back seat, while they allow for: