Does it blow your mind?
We are winning and that is why they are fighting so hard to stop us! YOU did it!
We are winning and that is why they are fighting so hard to stop us! YOU did it!
Trying to keep it relevant. Many of my “Allies” who post on the Holocaust would like me to “focus” a little more on specific events, but I think it better to make it all relevant for all of today’s issues. As the Zionist Agenda needs to be exposed for what it is, but still, in order to do that, I feel it must be relevant to today as well.
Certainly, it could be said that the Holocaust laid the groundwork for the biggest future frauds in history, and it is more than relevant. Not knowing how Zionism came to be, who they are, and how they “hoodwinked” is very important for understanding today.
Still, today, the same things are going on, and with the Internet, their main tool of control of the Media is diminishing as they fight back. Suppression has always been their key, and today “Censorship” is the only real tool they have left. As you can see with Facebook and YouTube Censorship, along with others, they are fighting like mad to keep the “dumbed down”, dumbed down, while continuing as well to promote more lies in a storm which is meant to encompass your mind.
A few ways out, I promote here. Namely:
MeWe I have spent some time on and can affirm that the Censorship is either irrelevant or for the most part eradicated. If you should decide to “jump out” of Facebook and other domains of “Social Media Suppression”, MeWe is a good place to start.
It will not move as quickly as Facebook when you first join. You need to join a bunch of Groups and “Create Your Own”, building a friends base etc. This will take time, but overall I think it is worth it.
I just joined this, as it came highly recommended. It is a place for uncensored video’s and especially when you get video’s like this one, without disclaimers, you know that to be true:
Now in sharing stuff, you may find that some Countries that you share to, or even Regions do not allow stuff from here or other uncensored places. For that, you need a VPN. Anything I produce here is done in Canada which is visible. There are many VPN’s to pick from, yet I find this “Free Trial” to work the best if for you this is a regular occurrence. Simply change your computer (or phone) IP Address to that of Canada to view anything you find here. If still blocked, let me know, as sometimes my links get taken down and I need to replace them with new links. You help out all of Humanity when you let me know.
I have hundreds of posts and each with links and documentation in them, along with Videos. You can use this following link to “About” in order to find all the archives, and once there you can search for “Keywords”. On your phone, in the upper right-hand corner is a dropdown of options which you can “Find in Page” or if using a laptop, a tablet, or a computer, use (once at the page) Cntrl F or Command, fn, F (for Apple) to search for keywords.
Yet what is most important is that you share. Share Worldwide, and don’t limit your sharing to “one medium”. At the bottom of each post, I have links to various Social Media platforms that you can share too. Please share more than once, when you do share, as I hope you do and share often.
OF THE estimated 70m deaths due to famines in the 20th century, at least 40m occurred under communist regimes in China, the Soviet Union, North Korea and Cambodia. The precise number of deaths remains uncertain, as do the causes, owing to the difficulty of disentangling the effects of war, revolution, and disease, as well as those regimes’ isolation and secrecy. Even low estimates, however, are damning: what clearer illustration could there be of socialism’s impracticality than its repeated failure to feed its own people?
In her powerful account of the famine in Soviet Ukraine in the early 1930s Anne Applebaum, a Pulitzer Prize-winning writer (and a former journalist at The Economist), tells an even more sinister story. Far from an unintended result of ill-conceived policies, she argues, the roughly 4m deaths from hunger in 1932 and 1933 were part of a deliberate campaign by Josef Stalin and the Bolshevik leadership to crush Ukrainian national aspirations, literally starving actual or potential bearers of those aspirations into submission to the Soviet order. As her book’s subtitle says, Stalin was waging “war on Ukraine”, the Soviet Union’s strategically and economically most valuable republic after Russia. War, as Carl von Clausewitz famously put it, is the continuation of politics by other means. The politics, in this case, was the Sovietisation of Ukraine; the means was starvation. Food supply was not mismanaged by Utopian dreamers. It was weaponized.
As Ms. Applebaum notes, this is not a new argument. Émigré survivors of the famine said as much in the 1950s. They were largely dismissed, however, as right-wing conspiracy-mongers is driven by anti-communism and Ukrainian nationalist hatred of Russia. Thirty years later, though, a documentary film, “Harvest of Despair” (produced by members of Canada’s Ukrainian community) and Robert Conquest’s book “Harvest of Sorrow” began to change minds. For the first time, the word Holodomor (Ukrainian for “killing by hunger”) began to reach large audiences.
With the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991, scholars gained access to an enormous trove of historical documents, not least in newly independent Ukraine. No evidentiary smoking gun has yet emerged demonstrating orders from the Kremlin to impose famine. What has come to light, and what Ms. Applebaum synthesizes in lucid and vigorous prose, is a devastating circumstantial case. “Red Famine” presents a Bolshevik government so hell-bent on extracting wealth and controlling labor that it was willing to confiscate the last remaining grain from hungry peasants (mostly but not exclusively in Ukraine) and then block them from fleeing famine-afflicted areas to search for food.
The book’s most powerful passages describe the moral degradation that resulted from sustained hunger, as family solidarity and village traditions of hospitality withered in the face of the overwhelming desire to eat. Under a state of siege by Soviet authorities, hunger-crazed peasants took to consuming, grass, animal hides, manure and occasionally each other. People became indifferent to the sight of corpses lying in streets, and eventually to their own demise. Stalin was not only aware of the ensuing mass death (amounting to roughly 13% of Ukraine’s population). He actively sought to suppress knowledge of it (including banning the publication of census data), so as not to distract from the campaign to collectivise Soviet agriculture and extend the Communist Party’s reach into the countryside—a campaign Ms. Applebaum calls a “revolution…more profound and more shocking than the original Bolshevik revolution itself”.
Known for her sharply critical previous books about Stalin’s gulag and the Sovietisation of eastern Europe after the second world war, Ms. Applebaum is not shy about suggesting parallels between Stalin’s war and Vladimir Putin’s campaign in Ukraine today. “Eighty years later,” she writes, “it is possible to hear the echo of Stalin’s fear of Ukraine—or rather his fear of unrest spreading from Ukraine to Russia—in the present too.” “Red Famine” claims that Ukraine’s current “pathologies”—including political passivity and tolerance of corruption—can be traced back to the famine. Those qualities, however, can be found in nearly every country that emerged from the Soviet collapse, including Russia. While stressing Stalin’s goal of crushing Ukrainian nationalism, moreover, Ms. Applebaum passes over a subtler truth. For along with its efforts to root out “bourgeois” nationalisms, the Kremlin relentlessly promoted a Soviet version of Ukrainian identity, as it did with most other ethnic minorities. Eight decades on, that legacy has done even more to shape today’s Ukraine than the Holodomor.
Stalin’s assault on the Ukrainian peasantry marked the third in a series of attempts to modernize the inherited agrarian order, following the emancipation of the serfs in 1861 and prime minister Pyotr Stolypin’s attempt in 1912 to transform former serfs into yeoman farmers. With searing clarity, “Red Famine” demonstrates the horrific consequences of a campaign to eradicate “backwardness” when undertaken by a regime in a state of war with its own people.
Consistently foretold the coming ruin and have sought to dissociate themselves from it. And that party is either the Left: and then God help us! for it will lead us to complete destruction – to Bolshevism, or else it is a party of the Right which at the last, when the people are in utter despair, when it has lost all its spirit and has no longer any faith in anything, is determined for its part ruthlessly to seize the reins of power – that is the beginning of resistance of which I spoke a few minutes ago. Here, too, there can be no compromise – there are only two possibilities: either the victory of the Aryan, or annihilation of the Aryan and the victory of the Jew.
– Adolf Hitler
– Adolf Hitler
To put it quite clearly: we have an economic programme. Point No. 13 in that programme demands the nationalization of all public companies, in other words, socialization, or what is known here as socialism. … the basic principle of my Party’s economic programme should be made perfectly clear and that is the principle of authority… the good of the community takes priority over that of the individual. But the State should retain control; every owner should feel himself to be an agent of the State; it is his duty not to misuse his possessions to the detriment of the State or the interests of his fellow countrymen. That is the overriding point. The Third Reich will always retain the right to control property owners. If you say that the bourgeoisie is tearing its hair over the question of private property, that does not affect me in the least. Does the bourgeoisie expect some consideration from me?… Today’s bourgeoisie is rotten to the core; it has no ideas anymore; all it wants to do is earn money and so it does me what damage it can. The bourgeois press does me damage too and would like to consign me and my movement to the devil.
The Nordic Resistance Movement (NRM) held a rally in Stockholm on Saturday, facing off counter-protesters, who decried its members as neo-Nazis. The pan-Nordic group was registered as a political party in Sweden back in 2015 and is now readying for its very first general election in two weeks.
Lindberg described the ultimate goal of the NRM as “securing the existence of our people.” The phrase is an apparent nod to the so-called ‘14 words’ slogan, coined by David Lane – a notorious white supremacist and called a neo-Nazi from the US. This may be the case, but so far I am not so sure the accusation alone holds any water.
As if calling someone a “Poopie-Head” should be enough to disregard all they have to say, in the case of National Socialism and Hitler in General, the name callers seem to feel that no evidence is required!
“We want to take back the country from the traitors at the parliament,” Lindberg told RT’s Maria Finoshina, claiming that “between 20 and 30 percent of the inhabitants in Sweden is non-European.” The Swedes are soon to become a minority, the NRM leader believes, and eventually even can “cease to exist” in their own country.
“It’s already too late to just stop the immigration. We must kick them back,” he added.
Members of the NRM do not like being described as neo-Nazis, branding those who call them so “brainwashed,” but at the same time do not hide their fondness for the policies of National Socialist German Workers’ Party (NSDAP), better known as the Nazi Party of Adolf Hitler. But Lindberg went even further and didn’t shy away from praising Hitler personally and on camera.
Calling the Nazi leader “a very very good person for German people,” he claimed that Hitler “freed Germany from the globalists and the bankers, that have a grip over Sweden today.”
“He did what was necessary to secure his people’s freedom,” Lindberg went on. “We’re National Socialists, as Hitler was and we do whatever it takes to take our nation back.”
Germany’s infamous Fuhrer is surrounded with “a million lies,” which many “not so [well-thinking]” people do believe, Lindberg claimed. Other extremely controversial statements of the NRM leader included branding the Holocaust “probably the biggest lie in history,” as well as a bizarre (to some) claim that “Jews declared war on Germany.”
Following the supposedly shocking interview, RT reached several counter-protesters for comment, who were appalled by Lindberg’s remarks. One protester said that “Hitler took 95 percent” of her family in concentration camps. She may have had criminals as relatives, but I guess it would be too much to ask of her to pose that question.
“I cannot believe he said that Hitler was a good guy. That must be a cause for police to intervene,” another protester said. ⇐ Suppression always being the answer.
Besides the heated and highly controversial rhetoric though, the rally and the counter-protest ended without any major incidents.
The Scandinavian country, which has a long tradition of welcoming refugees, has seen a rise in far-right and anti-immigration sentiment, fueled by a surge in gang violence. Over the past few years, dozens of Swedes were injured or lost their lives in attacks in suburbs dominated by immigrant communities. An estimated 400,000 people filed for asylum in Sweden since 2012. No thought is ever given as to why there are such refugees, or the thoughts of bombing them out of “house and home” in an International War Crime might be a bad idea, causing not only refugee migration but possibly “bad attitudes” towards the Countries they are forced to migrate to, for making them homeless.
The issue of crime and immigration has become a central theme ahead of the September 9 election, where the NRM wants to present 24 candidates to the public, hoping to pass the four percent threshold to enter parliament. It seems that such “Believed Zionist Fantasies” of that “Mean ol’ Hitler Dude” and such have not fully worn off enough for some people who cannot give their “heads a shake” and realize that truth can only be suppressed for so long, and that when you “point fingers” at others to blame your problems on, you usually have 3 fingers pointed directly back at you.
August 24, 2018, RT.com
This was entirely predictable because that chemical attack script has been read out, with salty crocodile tears, fake concern, and mocked indignation by US talking heads over the years – since 2012, in fact, when former US President Obama himself drew his red line on Syria.
The latest script-reader to toe the chemical hoax line is President Trump’s national security adviser, John Bolton, who on August 22, stated: “…if the Syrian regime uses chemical weapons we will respond very strongly and they really ought to think about this a long time.”
Beyond the tattered veil of moral superiority that is US war propaganda, Bolton’s words were clearly a very public command to Al-Qaeda and co-extremists to stage yet another fake chemical attack.
Bolton’s statement was preceded by an August 21 France-UK-US (FUKUS) joint statement, likewise threatening further illegal bombing of Syria if a chemical attack in Syria occurred (based on evidence the US never has nor needs to reveal).
Recall that the last time they acted on such a threat, in April 2018, the US and its interventionist allies didn’t even wait for the Douma lie to be exposed, let alone for any mythical evidence to materialize, before they illegally bombed Syria with 103 missiles. The bombings occurred before the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) had a chance to visit the Douma sites in question.
It seems that FUKUS’ appetite for destroying Syria wasn’t satiated in April 2018, nor in the April 2017 bombings of Syria following unsubstantiated allegations around Khan Sheikhoun, Idlib.
Bolton’s assertions are backed by the usual suspects of the corporate media, fake human rights groups, “media activists”, and individuals linked to NATO’s Atlantic Council war propaganda think tank.
The over two decades-long dictator of Human Rights Watch (HRW), Ken Roth – who couldn’t even discern whether a video was Gaza’s Israeli-flattened Shuja’iyya or Syria when he tweeted about it being Aleppo in 2015 – is re-beating the Ghouta 2013 dead horse to scare would-be humanitarians around the world. The Western narrative of events in Ghouta been widely-discredited by journalists, and by the so-called “rebels” themselves.
However, many people are rightly skeptical and disbelieving of the alarm cries, having seen this sort of song and dance before. The war propaganda heightened dramatically just prior to and during the liberation of eastern Aleppo and of eastern Ghouta, to name but two examples.
Indeed, the AFP’s Twitter thread on Bolton’s threat is filled with almost-exclusively mocking comments about replaying the false flag chemical attack scenario, and other overused, unbelievable war propaganda. Likewise on NBCNews’ video of Bolton making the threats.
Doing the job of corporate media, others continue to pose valuable questions about this latest outbreak of propaganda on chemical weapons attacks.
Chemical weapons accusations are among the most overused war propaganda tactics during the war on Syria. From late 2012 to April 2018, NATO’s mouthpieces have screamed bloody chlorine or sarin. But time and again, they’ve been revealed as intellectually-challenged, supremely-unoriginal liars, to put it politely. Less shrill voices have pointed out the many occasions where so-called “rebels” had access to sarin, control over a chlorine factory, and motives for an attack to occur, among other prudent points.
Some of the more loudly blasted claims were: March 2013, in Khan al-Assal, Aleppo; August 2013, in eastern Ghouta areas; April 2017, in Khan Sheikhoun, Idlib; and April 2018, in Douma, eastern Ghouta.
Of the Khan al-Assal allegations, Carla Del Ponte, a lead member of the UNHRC Commission of Inquiry, stated that it was “rebels” which used sarin, saying: “I was a little bit stupefied by the first indications we got… they were about the use of nerve gas by the opposition.”
A Mint Press News journalist who went to the areas in question wrote of speaking to “rebels” and their family members who blamed Saudi Arabia’s Prince Bandar for sending them weapons they didn’t know were chemical weapons and didn’t know how to use.
Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh wrote and spoke on the sarin allegations, noting (among many things) that, “the sarin that the Syria army has, has a different chemical composition than the sarin that would be made by al-Nusra.”
Among the many questions, journalists should have posed around the April 2017 Khan Sheikhoun allegations is the question of how we can trust any of the samples by the OPCW when clearly there was no chain of custody: the area is controlled by Al-Qaeda or groups affiliated, groups which have a vested interest in fudging results.
As noted in an article by Moon of Alabama, there is also a distinct lack of certainty around the Khan Sheikhoun accusations. The article further notes that in the OPCW report on Khan Sheikhoun, there are what they mildly dub as irregularities: the 57 cases of patients being admitted to hospitals before the alleged incident occurred, and the contradictory results of blood vs urine samples in “sarin victims”.
Following the April 2018 White House accusation that the Syrian government used sarin in Douma, and in spite of Damascus’ insistence on an OPCW investigation, FUKUS bombed Syria, including Damascus’ densely-inhabited Barzeh district, destroying a site which was involved in the production of cancer treatment components, but not chemical weapons.
In Douma, medical staff said that patients had not shown symptoms of a chemical attack. Douma citizens likewise said there hadn’t been a chemical attack. Seventeen Douma civilians and medical staff testified this at the Hague. Corporate media snidely dismissed these testimonies.
The OPCW’s July 2018 interim report on Douma noted that in samples taken from alleged sites, no chemicals that are prohibited in the Chemical Weapons Convention were detected. The OPCW found traces of “chlorinated organic chemicals”, but not Sarin, as alleged by supposed expert Eliot Higgins and the White House, among others.
Who benefits from these repeated allegations? Would the Syrian government truly have benefited had it perpetrated any of these alleged attacks? No. Would it have been logical for the Syrian president to have ordered such a chemical attack, knowing it would bring forward the wrath of Obama, Trump, and their allies? Do these allegations benefit the regime-change coalition? Yes.
In their recent briefing report on the Douma allegations, the Working Group on Syria, Propaganda and Media analyzed the facts around the Douma allegations (and previous ones), the discrepancies around the official narratives, and the murky details behind experts bringing us “evidence”, including one expert with potential ties to the UK’s Secret Intelligence Service, MI6.
Factors which just might influence the official outcome of investigations.
Regarding the latest concerns by FUKUS about a chemical attack, I agree on one point: we should be concerned that there will be a new attack or staging thereof, but not by the Syrian government. As has happened so many times prior, a staged attack would be done by NATO’s tools in Syria.
In fact, Syrian media recently noted the likelihood that members of the White Helmets and Al-Qaeda in Syria recently transported shipments of barrels from a chlorine recycling factory near the Turkish border to terrorist-occupied areas of Idlib.
If true, indeed strange activities for a “neutral rescue” group, and a worrisome setting of the stage for a new round of accusations.
What Bolton, CNN, or any other mouthpieces of illegal intervention attempts in Syria are avoiding mentioning is the Al-Qaeda elephant in the room: the designated terrorist group, which now goes by Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), dominates Idlib. HTS supposedly “cut” ties with Al-Qaeda but still maintains the same ideology.
Envoy for the US-led coalition (pretending to defeat ISIS), Brett McGurk, even deemed Idlib “the largest Al-Qaeda safe haven since 9/11, tied directly to Ayman al-Zawahiri (current #Al-Qaedaleader) & this is a HUGE problem.”
Yet, CNN was just back in Idlib (having illegally entered, again), glossing over the Al-Qaeda factor, as predicted, and beginning, what will become, a nonstop stream of war propaganda focused on the city.
In fact, many on social media are predicting the recycled war propaganda memes we’ll be seeing more of soon from the regime-change coalition, including “last hospitals”, Bana al-Abed 3.0 child twitter accounts (Bana 2.0 accounts were created during the liberation of eastern Ghouta), and the latest emotive hashtag #EyesOnIdlib.
Days ago, HTS’ Abu Mohammed al-Golani spoke against the surrender of armed groups in Idlib. Another “Syrian rebel” in Idlib, an Egyptian Al-Qaeda commander, threatened Syrians, who might be considering reconciliation, with crucifixion.
It’s not only terrorists who oppose reconciliation. Western governments find that concept a thorn in the side of their intervention project. Reconciliation has brought peace and stability to areas across Syria, most recently Daraa governorate. When I went to Daraa in May 2018, terrorist shells rained down. Now, after a combination of military operations and reconciliations throughout Daraa, calm reigns, as in eastern Ghouta and Aleppo prior.
Yet, every time the process is beginning in a new area, terrorists shell humanitarian corridors, and Western talking heads squeal about unverified “atrocities”, turning wilfully blind eyes to Al-Qaeda and affiliates in Syria, and demonizing the Syrian and Russian governments for fighting terrorism in Syria.
The FUKUS August 21 statement also read: “We implore those countries to recognize that the unchecked use of chemical weapons by any state presents an unacceptable security threat to all states.”
I’m fairly certain I’m not alone in demanding the US and its allies be held accountable for their documented, unchecked and criminal use of chemical weapons on civilians around the world.
–Eyes on Idlib: Syrian children robbed of innocence to act as mouthpieces for US coalition proxies, August 16, 2018, Vanessa Beeley
–Briefing note: the alleged chemical attack in Douma on 7 April 2018, and other alleged chlorine attacks in Syria since 2014, by Paul McKeigue, Jake Mason, David Miller, Piers Robinson, Members of Working Group on Syria, Propaganda, and Media
–UN On Khan Sheikhoun – Victims Hospitalized BEFORE Claimed Incident Happened, October 29, 2017, Moon of Alabama
–‘They know that we know they are liars, they keep lying’: West’s war propaganda on Ghouta crescendos, March 21, 2018, Eva Bartlett
–Terrorist capabilities laid bare in an Eastern Ghouta chemical lab, March 16, 2018, Sharmine Narwani
–Syrian civilians from ground zero expose the chemical hoax, June 1, 2018, Eva Bartlett
Temple organizations issue half-shekel coin showing Trump alongside Cyrus, King of Persia. ‘Cyrus – Balfour – Trump – Declaration 2018.’
Temple organizations have issued a half-shekel coin, the likes of which the Torah mandates every Jewish male must donate to the Temple, with a weight of 9.5 grams in real silver.
On the facade of the coin is a picture of the Temple with the inscription “Half Shekel.” On the other side is the figure of US President Donald Trump, alongside Cyrus, King of Persia, who made the building of the Second Temple possible. Below them is the inscription, “Cyrus – Balfour – Trump – Declaration 2018.”
The producers of the coin say that it is in high demand abroad. Prof. Hillel Weiss, Chairman of the organization “Hamikdash Betzion” (The Temple in Zion), says that the motivation to embed the image of the President of the United States on the coin is gratitude for his support of Israel and especially for the recognition of our sovereignty over Jerusalem. “This is a historic act for which the Jewish people is grateful,” says Weiss, who believes that the declaration sets off a process at the height of which the Temple will be rebuilt.
I have been talking about this for Years! People catching on now, are repeating what I said years ago. You cannot start with the War on Terror or even 911. You cannot start with the Oded Yinon Plan and you cannot even start with the creation of Israel. You cannot start with the Holocaust (although you are getting really close, and far more informed) and you cannot start even with Hitler or WWII. You are not going to get it.
So, after writing blogs about it, and posts, and putting them up in Groups and Pages (mainly on Facebook) and having the debates, and the fights and the wars and the posts being deleted and being suspended and having myself suppressed in “Every Way To Sunday”, I watched as the stuff hit the Internet backing everything I was saying. Old and new. David Irving videos. Ernst Zundel. I must confess, that even though I myself refused to look at some of the stuff, thinking it was far too out there to promote as real, I was brought back to it, as others quoted it, over and over again, laying down more evidence that some of the stuff I refused to look at, was more than credible. More than true. Absolutely the basis for the lies I was confronted with today, and I kept uncovering under every rock. Finally, while I still could (as much of my ability to make these videos has been taken away from me, my paid apps unable to mesh with YouTube and such, because YouTube was bending over backward to suppress), I produced ONE VIDEO which put it all together for the viewer. Taking in all the stuff I used to be afraid to look at myself, along with the stuff that kept popping up in my research.
Far more than this movie goes into, but it does a good job. Of course, the rest were lies too, and some, even this film cannot touch on, as heads would roll. They have been rolling heads on the Holocaust for a long time now. Investigation here will show you that clearly. Never discussed is the reason (although not hidden) of the German Invasion of Poland as the reason for WWII. However, they, of course, cannot show justification if they tried for fighting over a Corridor splitting Germany in two by Poland which (that Corridor “So Important”) no longer exists, as there was no justification for that war. Without the pushing of Britain and France and their backing and being pushed by the Rothschilds, there just is no reason for WWII.
National Socialism did uphold “Pride in Race” but it also expected and respected other races that had pride in theirs. As much as I hate it when people “on my side” speak of Jews being the problem, and our need to “correct them” by stating it is not the Jews, but the Zionists which they really are speaking of, this misconception of Neo-Nazi resembling anything of National Socialism is just as much a fallacy. It is not the same thing. Not in any way.
National Socialists in Hitler’s Germany were proud people. They strove for perfection. They dressed well. They spoke properly. They had pride in everything they did. That was the point. To be a “proud Germanic Race” and whether other races had pride in themselves was up to themselves. National Socialists were nothing, in any way, like the Neo-Nazi Movements of today.
National Socialists were concerned first and foremost with Germany’s success and expansion, setting an example, and really German influence of Europe and much of abroad (perhaps at best with a couple of ally nations alongside who would ultimately, push comes to shove, have to take a backseat to Berlin’s directives), neo-Nazis — particularly non-German ones — mostly tend to take away a German-centric, German supremacist vision. As pride in a race goes, touting that yours is superior is merely natural if striving so hard to be as perfect as you can possibly be.
Where it’s now more like “white Europeans” (or white people abroad), who are all “Aryans”, ideally united as one (if only more of them would “awaken” to it). Ostensibly standing together against the impending (or already occurring as a result of Western International War Crimes) Islamic invasion of Europe, and global leftism and liberalism, and global capitalism/banking, and global socialism/communism.
All of which is ultimately controlled of course by “global Zionism” (Claimed Jewish, or Christian (as in Christian Zionism)); which remains the ultimate enemy.
Real WWII era Nazis cannot truly be called ‘white supremacist’ as such. But rather simply primarily German supremacist.
If they had been a white supremacist, they would not have looked down upon so distinctly (and treated so brutally and poorly — with plans to treat even worse after the war) so many other neighboring (not significantly different in appearance) ‘white’ people of Europe.
— Neo-Nazis, on the other hand, are basically a species of white supremacist and/or white separatist. Most claim to be Hitlerites, or really almost what amounts to “fanboy” types (some are more obsessed with or concerned about actually mimicking the Third Reich than others).
Hearsay aside,— does not exactly represent the truth. What Hitler joined had a few transformations.
Corporal Adolf Hitler was ordered in September 1919 to investigate a small group in Munich known as the German Workers’ Party.
The use of the term ‘workers’ attracted the attention of the German Army which was now involved in crushing Marxist uprisings.
On September 12th, dressed in civilian clothes, Hitler went to a meeting of the German Workers’ Party in the back room of a Munich beer hall, with about twenty-five people. He listened to a speech on economics by Gottfried Feder entitled, “How and by what means is capitalism to be eliminated?”
After the speech, Hitler began to leave when a man rose up and spoke in favor of the German state of Bavaria breaking away from Germany and forming a new South German nation with Austria.
This enraged Hitler and he spoke out forcefully against the man for the next fifteen minutes uninterrupted, to the astonishment of everyone. One of the founders of the German Workers’ Party, Anton Drexler, reportedly whispered: “He’s got the gift of the gab. We could use him.”
After Hitler’s outburst ended, Drexler hurried over to Hitler and gave him a forty-page pamphlet entitled: “My Political Awakening.” He urged Hitler to read it and also invited Hitler to come back again.
In Mein Kampf, Hitler describes the condition of the party: “aside from a few directives, there was nothing, no program, no leaflet, no printed matter at all, no membership cards, not even a miserable rubber stamp…”
Although unimpressed by the present condition of the German Workers’ Party, Hitler was drawn to the sentiment expressed by Drexler that this would somehow become a movement not just a political party. And in this disorganized party, Hitler saw opportunity.
“This absurd little organization with its few members seemed to me to possess the one advantage that it had not frozen into an ‘organization,’ but left the individual opportunity for real personal activity. Here it was still possible to work, and the smaller the movement, the more readily it could be put into the proper form. Here, the content, the goal, and the road could still be determined…”
He spent two days thinking it over then decided.
“I finally came to the conviction that I had to take this step…It was the most decisive resolve of my life. From here there was and could be no turning back.”
Adolf Hitler joined the committee of the German Workers’ Party (Deutsche Arbeiterpartei or DAP) and thus entered politics.
Until the late 1920s, the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (NSDAP, better known to history as the Nazis) was a minor political party, one of several nationalist groups on the fringe of Weimar politics. It emerged from humble beginnings, beginning in January 1919 as a tiny Bavarian group called the German Workers’ Party (DAP, short for Deutsche Arbeitpartei). The party’s founding members were unremarkable characters. Anton Drexler was a factory worker and aspiring poet who had supported German involvement in World War I. Gottfried Feder was an economist with a grudge against greedy bankers. Karl Harrer and Dietrich Eckart were insignificant figures, both previously involved in writing and publishing political pamphlets containing nationalist ideas.
Together they coddled together a few dozen followers and met sporadically through 1919, where they cursed the SPD government, foreign powers, and Zionists.
In July 1921 Drexler stood down as party chairman, allowing Hitler to fill this role. Two months later Hitler scrapped the NSDAP’s council and declared himself the party’s Fuhrer (absolute leader). Two years after joining the DAP, Hitler was now solely responsible for policy and decision-making. He ordered the formation of a paramilitary branch, the Sturmabteilung (the SA, later known as the ‘Brownshirts’) to deal with political opponents. He also formed the Hitler-Jugend (Hitler Youth) to attract young people to the party, acquired a newspaper and adopted the swastika (a common motif) as the party’s emblem. By the end of 1921, the NSDAP had several thousand members, a considerable improvement on the few dozens of late 1919.
The NSDAP grew slowly through 1921-22. It was popular with ex-soldiers, who identified with the decorated war veteran Hitler, sympathizing with his passionate nationalism and his attacks on the Weimar government. Small businessmen and unemployed workers, in search of answers to their own miseries, also joined the group. Hitler’s rousing speeches delivered convenient scapegoats for Germany’s problems: the ‘November criminals’ who signed the armistice, the liberals and socialists who signed the hated Treaty of Versailles, the communists who threatened revolution in Germany, the Jewish bankers and conspirators who plotted to undermine and destroy the German state. Well oiled by free beer supplied at NSDAP meetings and rallies, Hitler’s audiences lapped up these conspiracy theories, hanging on the fuhrer’s every word and applauding his calls for the overthrow of the Weimar government.
Yet for all their popularity in and around Munich, Hitler and the NSDAP were very much a regional phenomenon. Their supporter base was mostly in Bavaria; they were hardly known in northern, western or central Germany or in the capital. This would change after Hitler’s failed attempt to overthrow the Bavarian provincial government (November 1923), which thrust the NSDAP leader into the national spotlight. Hitler’s treason trial and his political diatribe in the courtroom received significant coverage and helped increase the party’s national profile.
On his release from prison in 1924, Hitler pledged to transform the NSDAP from a revolutionary movement into a legitimate parliamentary party – not to participate in democracy but to infiltrate it and destroy it from within. Nevertheless, for much of the 1920s, the NSDAP remained a largely insignificant party holding just a handful of Reichstag seats. Hitler’s extremist rhetoric won him some supporters but alienated a much larger section of the German electorate. It would take the economic catastrophe of the Great Depression to boost the NSDAP’s popularity and electoral fortunes.
To deal with the massive unemployment and economic paralysis of the Great Depression, both the US and German governments launched innovative and ambitious programs. Although President Franklin Roosevelt’s “New Deal” measures helped only marginally, the Third Reich’s much more focused and comprehensive policies proved remarkably effective. Within three years unemployment was banished and Germany’s economy was flourishing. And while Roosevelt’s record in dealing with the Depression is pretty well known, the remarkable story of how Hitler tackled the crisis is not widely understood or appreciated.
Adolf Hitler became Chancellor of Germany on January 30, 1933. A few weeks later, on March 4, Franklin Roosevelt took office as President of the United States. Each man remained his country’s chief executive for the next twelve years — until April 1945, shortly before the end of World War II in Europe. In early 1933 industrial production in each country had fallen to about half of what it had been in 1929. Each leader quickly launched bold new initiatives to tackle the terrible economic crisis, above all the scourge of mass unemployment. And although there are some striking similarities between the efforts of the two governments, the results were very different.
One of the most influential and widely read American economists of the twentieth century was John Kenneth Galbraith. He was an advisor to several presidents, and for a time served as US ambassador to India. He was the author of several dozen books, and for years taught economics at Harvard University. With regard to Germany’s record, Galbraith wrote: “… The elimination of unemployment in Germany during the Great Depression without inflation — and with initial reliance on essential civilian activities — was a signal accomplishment. It has rarely been praised and not much remarked. The notion that Hitler could do no good extends to his economics as it does, more plausibly, to all else.”
Even before the year 1933 had ended, Hitler had succeeded in building 202,119 housing units. Within four years he would provide the German people with nearly a million and a half (1,458,128) new dwellings!
Moreover, workers would no longer be exploited as they had been. A month’s rent for a worker could not exceed 26 marks, or about an eighth of the average wage then. Employees with more substantial salaries paid monthly rents of up to 45 marks maximum.
Equally effective social measures were taken in behalf of farmers, who had the lowest incomes. In 1933 alone 17,611 new farmhouses were built, each of them surrounded by a parcel of land one thousand square meters in size. Within three years, Hitler would build 91,000 such farmhouses. The rental for such dwellings could not legally exceed a modest share of the farmer’s income. This unprecedented acquisition of land and housing was only one feature of a revolution that soon dramatically improved the living standards of the Reich’s rural population.
The great work of national construction rolled along. An additional 100,000 workers quickly found employment in repairing the nation’s secondary roads. Many more were hired to work on canals, dams, drainage and irrigation projects, helping to make fertile some of nation’s most barren regions.
Everywhere industry was hiring again, with some firms — like Krupp, IG Farben, and the large automobile manufacturers — taking on new workers on a very large scale. As the country became more prosperous, car sales increased by more than 80,000 units in 1933 alone. Employment in the auto industry doubled. Germany was gearing up for full production, with private industry leading the way.
The new government lavished every assistance on the private sector, the chief factor in employment as well as production. Hitler almost immediately made available 500 million marks in credits to private business.
This start-up assistance given to German industry would repay itself many times over. Soon enough, another two billion marks would be loaned to the most enterprising companies. Nearly half would go into new wages and salaries, saving the treasury an estimated three hundred million marks in unemployment benefits. Added to the hundreds of millions in tax receipts spurred by the business recovery, the state quickly recovered its investment and more.
From time to time (usually at the end of the Month or in the Middle (as here) I will display the top stats. I cannot display the big picture as it would take up too much room on a Meme, but I can display the top stats anyway. You might need to “Zoom” in to read them, but they are here for you to see.
You see, I hope people copy the posts and make their own. Those would be untrackable on my stats here. Also, nobody is required to be a Member, and so Zionists clicking on the membership roles will give them no real information. Anyone can read here, and at most, they might need a:
They cannot possibly know how much of this information is being spread, and sure, they can find a link included in one of the posts, and block it, but then I will find where they did that (eventually) and replace it, and they will not know that I did that. LOL.
It is mainly videos that they block from Zionist Owned Mediums like YouTube, but that is ok, as I try to create as much stuff HERE as needed, and if a video is blocked, you can simply go searching for what I am talking about on YouTube or in other Mediums like Vimeo to find it. If I feel it is information which presently exists on a Website which can be shut down, or is really “Toxic” towards Zionists, I may simply re-create the posting in full, as I did here with the German Camp Records:
You can search for the topics on the site (from past posts) using keywords. Simply go to “About” (sidebar or at the bottom or in a drop-down from the top) and using “Ctrl F” for some devices or “Command, fn, F” for Apple, you will get your needed search engine to find stuff in:
Since the site encompasses both full text and documentation, along with links to other places on the web where you can find the documentation, at best Zionists can do is to block a link or a site. Yet they will not be able to block it all, and especially when you “Internet Warriors” do copy the posts from here and produce your own.
I also make sure that NO MONEY is taken in by this website, and so there is nothing they can harm me with financially for posting the truth. I have gone “Out Of My Way” to make this “Un-Suppressive-Able”.
I also link to other Social Media which is free from suppression, like:
No more need for Facebook Suppression at all. So, for those of you Warriors who are spreading the Word Worldwide, (and hopefully stealing from here), I present how we are doing overall. As we can win this War for Humanity, with simple Education, and there is no need for a shot to be fired.
They are lost anyway.