Greater Israel is on it’s way!

enter bolton

There have been multiple reports that President Donald Trump is unhappy with his National Security Adviser, Lt. Gen. H. R. McMaster. As rumors increased about a McMaster departure so, too, did speculation that George W. Bush’s never-confirmed ambassador to the United Nations, the arch-neoconservative John Bolton, might be named as McMaster’s replacement. Bolton has reportedly been seen at the White House on several occasions briefing Trump and other high-level officials.

John Bolton as National Security Adviser, with Nikki Haley in Bolton’s old job at the U.N. and fundamentalist Christian dominionist Mike Pompeo moving from CIA director to replace Rex Tillerson as Secretary of State, means that the neocons — never happy with the prospects of a Trump administration – will, once again, be in the driver’s seat of American foreign policy after a nine-year hiatus. Bolton’s tenure at the U.N. was punctuated by his own undiplomatic outbursts, as well as those of his spokesman, Richard Grenell, Trump’s nominee to be US ambassador to Germany. Bolton strenuously pushed the neocon foreign policy line, as spelled out in the charter for the movement founded in 1997, the Project for the New American Century (PNAC).

Bolton is a staunch interventionist, which would appear at odds with the non-entanglement foreign policy espoused by Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign. However, as Trump entered his second year in office, it was apparent that one branch of the neocons, the most hawkish element and one linked to the Christian fundamentalist wing of the Republican Party, had captured control of the foreign policy levers of the Trump White House. Bolton has called for the US to declare war on Iran and North Korea and he has advocated for a US troop deployment to Syria to combat the forces of President Bashar al-Assad.

Bolton also favors scrapping the Iran P5+1 nuclear agreement, known formally as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Bolton’s international views are no different than those of Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, a camaraderie Bolton shares with Trump.

The mere fact that Bolton has been a recent frequent guest at the Trump White House and that Trump reportedly values Bolton’s advice is a threat to global peace.

On June 29, 2017, long after Trump sought Bolton’s advice, the former ersatz US ambassador to the UN wrote the following neocon screed for Fox News:

“There are signs the Assad government may be planning another chemical attack. American pilots have struck forces threatening our allies and shot down a Syrian plane and Iranian-made drones. The probability of direct military confrontation between the US and Russia has risen . . . Instead of reflexively repeating President Obama’s errors, the Trump administration should undertake an ‘agonizing reappraisal,’ in the style of John Foster Dulles, to avoid squandering the victory on the ground . . . In Syria, Kurdish forces fighting ISIS [Islamic State] are linked to the Marxist PKK in Turkey. They pose a real threat to Turkey’s territorial integrity.”

Bolton wants the United States to declare the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization and supports Trump’s backing of the Saudi Arabian and United Arab Emirates embargo against Qatar as punishment for its ties to both the Brotherhood and Iran. Bolton also wants to be added to the US terrorist list Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Bolton is on record as favoring the creation of a new “secular” Sunni state in Iraq that would be bankrolled by Saudi Arabia. The new Sunni state, in Bolton’s view, would stymie the creation of a Shi’a arc of control extending from Iran through Iraq to Syria and Lebanon.

On the issue of Palestine, Bolton has demanded the abolishment of the U.N. Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), which administers aid programs for Palestinian refugees. In May 2017, before accepting the Guardian of Zion Award from Bar-Ilan University in Jerusalem, Bolton told The Jerusalem Post that the “two-state solution” of Israel and an independent Palestinian state should be abandoned, Hamas, Fatah, and the Palestinian Authority disbanded, Gaza given to Egypt, and the West Bank divided between Israel and Jordan. Bolton cynically said he believes in a “three-state solution” with Israel, Egypt, and Jordan taking control of current Palestinian territory. While representing the Bush administration at the U.N., Bolton and his chief adviser Grenell was known for coordinating all of America’s votes on Middle Eastern matters with the Israeli delegation.

Bolton’s worldview is to turn the clock back to the 1950s and the “containment” policy advanced by Secretary of State Dulles. In the 1950s, “containment” meant containing the Soviet Union. For Bolton, containment now applies to boxing in Iran, joining Turkey in defeating the Syrian Kurds because Bolton believes they are linked to a “Marxist” Kurdish party in Turkey and seeking the overthrow of the Assad government in Syria. That Bolton has gotten the ear of Trump, whose worldview is a mile wide and a half-inch deep, should trouble the Middle East, South Asia, and beyond.

Bolton’s neocon rhetoric on NATO is no less alarming. He wants membership in NATO fast-tracked for Ukraine and Georgia. Bolton as Trump’s national security adviser would help usher into the Trump White House Bolton’s fellow neocons ensconced at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, where Bolton enjoys a senior fellowship. Bolton favored US military action to prevent to retrocession of Crimea to the Russian Federation. Bolton’s appointment as Trump’s national security adviser would avoid US Senate confirmation, which, for Trump, would mean no contentious Senate floor battle with such anti-Bolton Republicans as Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky.

In yet another hearkening back to the days of Dulles, Bolton has promoted an updated version of the discredited “domino theory” for the Western Hemisphere. President Ronald Reagan tried to convince the American public that if the Sandinista government was permitted to take root in Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and soon, Mexico, would fall to the Communists. Reagan warned that the Communists could then take over the US-Mexican border town of Harlingen, Texas because it was two-days driving time from Nicaragua. Bolton served in the Reagan State Department alongside such neocons as Elliott Abrams, the Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs and the person behind Reagan’s “Communists in Harlingen” nonsense. It was also a so-called “domino theory” that was promoted by Bolton’s hero, Dulles, and his Cold War successors as Secretary of State to defend US military intervention in Southeast Asia to prevent Communism from spreading from China and North Vietnam to Thailand, Malaysia, and, eventually, even Sydney, Australia and Honolulu, Hawaii.

Bolton views the instability in Venezuela as a prelude to such anarchy spreading to Colombia and throughout South and Central America. Bolton believes that Cuba and Nicaragua are working hand-in-glove with Venezuela to destabilize Latin America and the Caribbean. Bolton opposed the normalization of US relations with Cuba and he supports Trump’s downgrading of those ties. Of course, Bolton fails to mention that it was under the Bush administration that repeated US attempts to destabilize Venezuela began and they never ceased. Bolton would rather see Venezuela fall under the control of a right-wing autocrat, such as those who gained power in Brazil, Argentina, and Chile from progressive presidents.

Bolton actually believes Iran is exploiting the political turmoil in Venezuela to gain access to the country’s uranium deposits. He also is convinced that Hezbollah has established a drug-running network in Latin America. Bolton has called on Trump to reassert the arcane Monroe Doctrine – proclaiming the Western Hemisphere as America’s domain – because of “Russian meddling” in Latin America. Bolton’s predilection for such conspiracy theories, while welcomed and highly sought in Republican Party cuckoo land, is not the product of sober intelligence analysis of world events. John Bolton, a dangerous madman, certainly has no place in any White House, particularly one that is already led by someone who is mentally unhinged.

Warmonger John Bolton Named National Security Adviser

German General Erwin Rommel


Author David Irving discusses the life and times of the WW2 German general Erwin Rommel, the famous Desert Fox. Irving wrote a biography of Rommel using his famous research method which brought to life a more complete picture of him.

Part one of two (30 Min)

Part two of two (30 Min)

Made by our “Canadian Hero” Ernst Zundel

What can we do about the insanity?

Screen Shot 2018-03-21 at 8.48.49 AM

Most people are not that dumb.  They do not look because it does not fit with their circumstance.

It is one thing to “Hoodwink the Population” with outright LIES and Zionist Controlled Propaganda, but, after all, there needs to be popular in the belief in order to conduct crap like War and Killing of innocent people.

The suicide rate among Soldiers doing the killing is astronomical.  For good reasons too.  Just like P.T.S.D.  They know in their hearts that what they are doing is wrong.  Yet they see no other choices.

The USA is a major example, as Capitalism and the Military Industrial Complex want to make sure that the kids have few other real choices.  Education kept to a minimum, there are few options for kids getting out of Schools.

In a land where there is no good reason for Homelessness and lack of Health Care, it is kept rampant and “on purpose” in American Society.  Welfare rates so low, it gives people just UNDER what they really need to survive.  That is what the kids face.  The intelligent and the not intelligent are faced with the same scenario.  If they choose to recognize the truth for what it is, they face the poverty that awaits them.

Yet in the Schools and the “Sports Arena” (invented by the Romans to keep people distracted and training for war), the Military Industrial Complex sets up shop.  Join the Military, and you get 3 Hots and a Cot!  Education, Health Care, and even a Pension (should you survive).

Given these choices, those who choose the latter, out of desperation, are more willing to accept the Promoted Propaganda of Mainstream Media.  The destruction of the Family Unit gives way for any real mentoring in the general population.

Knowing the TRUTH is not in their best interest!

Still, with that being said, 2 things remain a fact.  This is an Endless Spiral of devastation to society if these 2 things are not worked on.

#1 Education.  I leave this in YOUR HANDS to spread the truth to and for humanity.

#2 Resistance.  If you look hard enough and educate yourself enough (using especially the internet) you can find ways to get by or do well “on your own” without falling into the trap of singing “Zionist Propaganda Songs” as your heart tells you it is wrong.

As they did in Vietnam, throw down your Guns!

You can no longer HIDE your Lies!

Every Crack

Sure enough, MOST are still being Hoodwinked by MSM

Yet the biggest advertising is “Word Of Mouth” and it becomes even stronger when it is done for FREE.   I compiled the links of evidence to expose your frauds!  They can find it


In About by clicking here

And they can share it Worldwide in various Mediums which you cannot stop them from doing at the bottom of each post with a single click:

Screen Shot 2018-03-19 at 4.42.24 PM

It is merely a matter of time!

A losing game for you, as you have NO EVIDENCE to go on but hearsay!

They, on the other hand, have the FACTS

And this to Inspire them to Victory!

Final Straw with Facebook

Facebook Impossible

In my last report, I reported they wanted a Photo.

That was supposed to be it, but they accepted my photo.  I talked about that here:

Enough is Enough

Yet they really do not like what I posted lately, and it has been TWICE now that they shut down my account over:


Ohh well, we go on, and the word is spreading.  You are all spreading it from here, where you can share with Facebook and PILES of other Social Mediums from the bottom of each post.

Samuel Untermyer 1858 -1940

220px-Samuel_Untermyer_cph.3b34313 (1)

Samuel Untermyer was born in Lynchburg, Virginia but after the death of his father, the rest of the family moved to New York City. He was educated at the College of the City of New York and received his LL.B. from Columbia Law School in 1878.

Ok, so what?  Who was this guy?

Samuel Untermyer was the chief Zionist architect of the 1930’s, and he helped create enmity toward the German Jewish community. His vitriol also helped propel America into World War 2.
Samuel Untermyer’s speech made on WABC, declaring a ‘holy war’ by the Jews against Germany, and appealing to the masses of non-Jewish humanity to boycott German-made imports and all merchants who have German-made items in their establishments. The entire speech was published in the New York times on the morning following the broadcast (August 7th, 1933) which was mentioned by Benjamin Freedman in his talk before a group of patriots.

A short excerpt from The World’s Trouble Makers gives further insight to this speech:

When Hitler had been soundly established, Samuel Untermeyer, a New York Jewish Lawyer, called for war on Germany. The call was made through radio station WABC on 8-7-33. He had just returned from a world conference of Jews at The Hague. In the broadcast, he said he was calling for a “holy war”, and described the Jews as “the aristocrats of the world”.

This same gentleman was connected with the Foreign Policy Association of New York and the worldwide organisation to move Jews out of Germany, not only into the United States, but to Palestine and other countries.  These activities were tied in with the organisation known as the “International Boycott on German Goods”, of which Untermeyer was the head!  From that time the “Hate Germany” campaign was intensified and made worldwide, with a special Jewish-organised “National Conference of Jews and Christians” assisting!  These are the hate-spreaders, but they never grow tired of praising themselves.  That marked the beginning of the Jewish exodus from Germany. 

We have all, on a world-wide scale, been sold the myth (lie) of the so-called Holocaust… “Six million Jews killed…”  Note Untermyer’s mention of the “600,000 souls we must save”.  That is from the horse’s mouth, in 1933, during the time the Jews were leaving Germany by the thousands.   

The “holocaust” lie has created a great guilt complex in people all over the world who had nothing to do with the murder of even one Jew, never mind the fallacious figure of six million allegedly killed in foreign countries.

The Balfour Declaration

In the same way that powerful Zionists personalities today conduct dark deals to shore up official support in contravention of international law, UN resolutions, and international public opinion, so they did a century ago.

Several personalities stand out, including Chaim Weizmann, Nahum Sokolow, Louis Brandeis and Samuel Untermyer. These men collaborated across continents in the halls of power to influence policies and place Zionists in important posts, particularly in France, England, and the United States.

Weizmann recruited the Rothschilds, used his charm, the promise of Jewish war-time loans, and prevailing anti-Semitic beliefs in Jewish power to seduce European statesmen to the Zionist cause.

Balfour the final fact box corrected

More on Balfour

Yet let us NOT forget the Scofield Bible!

Samuel Untermeyer had a lifelong interest in Zionism. He and the leaders of the Jewish Theological Seminary wanted to inject their beliefs into Christianity in America. But had they attempted to introduce their ideas into the dominant Protestant culture of 1900, they would have been ignored.

Subtlety was required deception. They needed a front man, a Protestant theologian of distinction through whom they could inject their beliefs gradually. Of course, there was no one that met this description. He would have to be created. Through some shadowy network, perhaps through contacts of the Secret Six in Boston, Samuel Untermeyer found such a man in Kansas.

In 1901, through Untermeyer’s influence, Scofield was admitted into a sophisticated men’s club in New York. The Lotus Club promoted social intercourse among friends of literature and fine arts. Joseph Canfield believes that the selection of Scofield for membership “strengthens the suspicion that someone was directing his career at this time.” 1

Untermeyer introduced Scofield to numerous Zionist and socialist leaders, including Samuel Gompers, Fiorello LaGuardia, Abraham Straus, Bernard Baruch and Jacob Schiff. 2 Scofield had a shady past, a criminal record, had just gotten out of jail and had never been to seminary. But this was no problem. With their control of the press, some public relations work and their international network he was quickly transformed into one of America’s leading theologians.

Untermeyer did more than introduce Scofield to his wealthy and influential Zionist circle in New York. Soon the Kansas con man was off on a lavish tour of Europe including an important visit to Oxford University where plans were made for the publication of his new reference Bible. Untermeyer’s network extended from Kansas to Europe and seemingly could open doors anywhere.

A wolf in sheep’s clothing was the oldest trick in the book. Jacob under the direction of Rebecca put on goat skin so he felt hairy like his brother Esau. Then he lied to Isaac, carried out his fraud and got the blessing. Gen 27:15 It is a trick Esau never forgot and has used time and again against his brother’s descendants. They never seem to learn. Scofield was merely sheepskin.

Paul warned that after he departed grievous wolves would enter in among the church. Acts 20:29. Samuel Untermeyer was a grievous wolf. A notorious criminal lawyer, he helped drag America into World War I which resulted in a million unnecessary deaths. This opened the door for the Bolshevik Revolution which by the time of his death in 1940 had resulted in the murder of over 20 million individuals. The church in Russia was virtually extinguished.

He declared war on Germany and established the blockade which forced World War II. And America’s entry into World War I created the nation-state of Palestine which many believe will trigger World War III.

His successful Scofield Bible deception perverted Christianity with the hybrid Christian Zionism and left a church where the true, historicist interpretation of Bible prophecy, is virtually unknown. Historicism had been the standard interpretation of prophecy since the reformation.

Finally, when one brave man, the popular Henry Ford, stood up to expose the Bolshevik wolf’s den in New York, Untermeyer and his partner waged continual war against him until the threat of murder caused him, at his wife’s desperate plea, to cease.

He that is a hireling, and not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and fleeth: and the wolf catcheth them, and scattereth the sheep. John 10:12

Jesus taught that it was the duty of a true shepherd when he sees a wolf in the church to defend the sheep and not flee. Those that are grazing unaware need to know about the man behind Scofield, a grievous wolf in sheep’s clothing.

*1 The Incredible Scofield, Joseph M. Canfield, Ross House Books, 1988, page 174.
*2 The Greatest Hoax, Charlie Samples, Cyrus Scofield – Who Was He? from the website

Read about the Scofield Bible Here

Ohh but we are not done with “Sammy Boy” here…

Samuel Untermyer, a hard-nosed lawyer, an eagle-eyed investor, a big-hearted civic leader, and a green-thumbed Horti-culturalist, was torn when America fought Germany in World War I—only to be among the first Americans to turn on Hitler’s Germany, long before America entered World War II.

In truth, Untermyer’s nostalgia for his ancestral homeland in 1917 was far more characteristic than his fiery advocacy 16 years later. Born to German Jewish immigrants turned Confederate supporters in 1858, Untermyer described himself “as one of German parentage, whose ancestors were for centuries embedded in the soil of that land,” and someone with the “strongest feeling of sympathy toward the German people.”

Indeed, Untermyer grew up in the clubby confines of the German immigrant elite. His law firm was a partnership of German-American relatives. He even married a non-Jewish German woman Minnie Carl. But within weeks of Adolf Hitler’s coming to power in January 1933, when most German Jews were deciding to stay in Nazi Germany—and most Americans were trying to appease it—Untermyer understood what was happening.

Filled with “revulsion against the sadistic cruelties of the present regime,” disgusted that “ninety-nine percent of the German people… are thereby relegated to semi-barbarism,” he demanded American action. He founded—and bankrolled—the campaign to boycott German goods. Although he was on the right side of history, as what the academic Richard Hawkins called “Hitler’s bitterest foe”—even many American Jewish leaders opposed him. The fight failed—and broke him, destroying his health.

Ironically, even while running this tough political battle, Untermyer also played the role of America’s most magnanimous and flamboyant gentleman farmer, who spent decades cultivating a New World Garden of Eden. In 1899, Untermyer bought Greystone-on-Hudson in Yonkers, New York, from the estate of the former Democratic presidential nominee Samuel Tilden. For the next 41 years, Untermyer collected and cultivated and cross-pollinated, until Betters Homes and Garden deemed his 163 acres worth of gardens “among the loveliest in America.”

It seems that, through some instinct for equilibrium, the cut-throat qualities that made Untermyer the first American lawyer to nab a one-million-dollar fee morphed into aesthetic impulses that made his multi-million bulb garden grow. At the same time, of course, the zeal that made him America’s first “Superman of law,” a Progressive do-gooder, and an anti-Nazi freedom fighter carried over into the obsessive way he cultivated his spread.

Untermyer embodied the American dream—with the Rockefeller-Carnegie corollary of giving back grandly once you’ve made it big. He grew up fatherless in New York City—after his father put all his money in Confederate bonds and all his faith in that thankfully lost cause. Educated at the City College of New York and Columbia Law School, Untermyer made his fortune in a family law firm Guggeinheimer and Untermeyer made up of other ambitious, well-educated, high-cultured, German-Jewish immigrants: his half-brother Randolph Guggenheimer, his brother Isaac Untermeyer, and, for a particularly productive four decades, his best friend from law school, the great jurist and American Jewish activist Louis Marshall.

Trying to prove monopolistic collaboration among six banking houses, Untermyer subpoenaed the King of Wall Street, J.P. Morgan. Untermyer made the banker wait for hours before testifying, hoping to agitate him. During this cinematic battle, Morgan thrilled his supporters by celebrating banking—and the giving of loans—as a matter of character. But Untermyer made Morgan look arrogant and ridiculous, as one of the most dictatorial men in America even denied having any power over his own firm. When Morgan died shortly after testifying, his son blamed Untermyer, nicknaming the lawyer “The Beast.”Untermyer took on more civic crusades—nationally and locally.

He helped Woodrow Wilson’s administration draft the Federal Reserve Act, the Clayton Anti-Trust Act, and the Federal Trade Commission Bill. Still, rumors of lawyerly corner cutting and shenanigans prevented Wilson from appointing Untermyer to any high government position. Within New York, Untermyer investigated corruption in the building trades, tried unsuccessfully to unite New York’s transit system but did help maintain the 5-cent subway fare. A publicity hound, he commented frequently on a range of international and domestic issues.

Yes, The Federal Reserve!


During the First World War, Untermyer struggled, enamored of Germany and appalled by the assaults on civil liberties the wartime surge in Americanism provoked. He warned in 1918 against “unreasoning hatred, intolerance, and hysteria, masquerading in the guise of intensive patriotism.”

Being a Zionist in America in the 1920s was unconventional—but nothing prepared him for the attacks he endured, from Jews and non-Jews, when he tore into Hitler during the boycott campaign. Founding and leading the Non-Sectarian Anti-Nazi League to Champion Human Rights, Untermyer was already warning in 1933 that “the Hitler party is bent upon the extermination of the Jews in Germany, or upon driving them out of the country.” Characteristically, Untermyer ran his organization with such single-mindedness,  even one ally called him “The Fuhrer.”

Morris Waldman, the Executive Secretary of the American Jewish Committee, lectured Untermyer, saying: “it is imperative that in this grave and highly delicate situation, no individual should speak or act for the Jewish people, but all should entrust the responsibility to recognized organizations like the American Jewish Committee and B’nai B’rith, who have been dealing with these problems for many years.”

Instead, Untermyer denounced these “timid” leaders for dithering. He mocked the “very large and respectable element among our people” opposing him—yet who fail “to suggest any other remedy.” He laced into the Jewish owners of R.H. Macy’s and other department stores who circumvented the boycott, proposing that Americans boycott Macy’s too. He acknowledged that some feared he was provoking Hitler into harsher acts, but giving a diagnosis of Nazis most Americans only accepted after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor eight years later, Untermyer wrote: “The men in control are bigoted fanatics to whom neither reason, justice nor humanity makes the slightest appeal. Their hatred is deep-seated and nothing but the fear of consequences will affect them.”

Untermyer’s wrath put his “most treasured” friendship with the great scientist Albert Einstein, at risk, due to Einstein’s silence regarding the boycott. Even in a letter inviting Mr. and Mrs. Einstein to visit him and mend fences, Untermyer couldn’t resist noting that Einstein was still a “hero” in Germany and could have helped tremendously, whereas “I am told that I have the distinction of being the most thoroughly hated and reviled man in Germany.” Of course, Untermyer was “proud of that distinction, and hope only that it is well-earned.”

Although the anti-Nazi boycott raised awareness of Nazi evil, it was more a warning light that most ignored rather than a spark plug that ignited America’s conscience. By 1938, Untermyer quit—and he died in March 1940.

It’s hard to know why some people can sense evil coming when most remain complacent. Still, we have much to learn from this enlightened gazillionaire, this aggressive reformer, this self-promoting do-gooder, who was able from his Yonkers Versailles to see his beloved Germany turn cruel—and was courageous enough to try stopping it.

Further Reading

The “Untermyer History” section of the Untermyer Gardens Conservancy website has a list of excellent articles.

Richard A. Hawkins, “Hitler’s bitterest foe”: Samuel Untermyer and the boycott of Nazi Germany, 1933-1938 (2007) details Untermyer heroic efforts.

The Hoodwink of the Scofield Bible


Do YOU believe that:

  • The Bible references a “Promised Land” for Jews in Palestine?
  • Jews are “God’s Chosen People”?
  • Islamophobia is “Something New”?

If so, you have been “Hoodwinked” in all or in part by the

Scofield Bible

The Scofield Bible—The Book That Made Zionists of America’s Evangelical Christians

By Maidhc Ó Cathail

“For a nation to commit the sin of anti-Semitism brings inevitable judgement.”

cathail—The New Scofield Study Bible

Since it was first published in 1909, the Scofield Reference Bible has made uncompromising Zionists out of tens of millions of Americans. When John Hagee, the founder of Christians United for Israel (CUFI), said that “50 million evangelical bible-believing Christians unite with five million American Jews standing together on behalf of Israel,” it was the Scofield Bible that he was talking about.

Although the Scofield Reference Bible contains the text of the King James Authorized Version, it is not the traditional Protestant bible but Cyrus I. Scofield’s annotated commentary that is problematic. More than any other factor, it is Scofield’s notes that have induced generations of American evangelicals to believe that God demands their uncritical support for the modern State of Israel.

Blessing Israel, Cursing Its Critics

Central to Christian Zionist belief is Scofield’s commentary (italicized below) on Genesis 12:3: “‘I will bless them that bless thee.’ In fulfillment closely related to the next clause, ‘And curse him that curseth thee.’ Wonderfully fulfilled in the history of the dispersion. It has invariably fared ill with the people who have persecuted the Jew—well with those who have protected him. The future will still more remarkably prove this principle.”

Drawing on Scofield’s rather tendentious interpretation, Hagee claims, “The man or nation that lifts a voice or hand against Israel invites the wrath of God.”

But as Stephen Sizer points out in his definitive critique, Christian Zionism: Road-map to Armageddon?(available from AET’s Middle East Books and More): “The promise, when referring to Abraham’s descendants, speaks of God blessing them, not of entire nations ‘blessing’ the Hebrew nation, still less the contemporary and secular State of Israel.”

Notwithstanding this more orthodox reading, The New Scofield Study Bible, published by Oxford University Press in 1984, intensified Scofield’s interpretation by adding, “For a nation to commit the sin of anti-Semitism brings inevitable judgement.”

“Sustained by a dubious exegesis of selective biblical texts,” Sizer concludes, “Christian Zionism’s particular reading of history and contemporary events…sets Israel and the Jewish people apart from other peoples in the Middle East…it justifies the endemic racism intrinsic to Zionism, exacerbates tensions between Jews and Palestinians and undermines attempts to find a peaceful resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, all because ‘the Bible tells them so.’”

The Incredible Scofield

In his 2008 book, The Rise of Israel: A History of a Revolutionary State, Jonathan R. Adelman describes the crucial support Israel receives from Christian fundamentalists as “totally fortuitous.” That assertion is belied, however, by the incredible career of the man who wrote “the Bible of Fundamentalism.”

Two years after Scofield’s reported conversion to Christianity in 1879, the Atchison Patriot was less than impressed. Describing the former Atchison resident as the “late lawyer, politician and shyster generally,” the article went on to recount a few of Scofield’s “many malicious acts.” These included a series of forgeries in St. Louis, for which he was sentenced to six months in jail.

Being a “born again” preacher did not preclude Scofield from becoming a member of an exclusive New York men’s club in 1901, either. In his devastating biography, The Incredible Scofield and His Book, Joseph M. Canfield suggests, “The admission of Scofield to the Lotus Club, which could not have been sought by Scofield, strengthens the suspicion that has cropped up before, that someone was directing the career of C.I. Scofield.”

That someone, Canfield suspects, was associated with one of the club’s committee members, the Wall Street lawyer Samuel Untermeyer. As Canfield intimates, Scofield’s theology was “most helpful in getting Fundamentalist Christians to back the international interest in one of Untermeyer’s pet projects—the Zionist Movement.”

Others have been even more explicit about the nature of Scofield’s service to the Zionist agenda. In “Unjust War Theory: Christian Zionism and the Road to Jerusalem,” Prof. David W. Lutz writes, “Untermeyer used Scofield, a Kansas City lawyer with no formal training in theology, to inject Zionist ideas into American Protestantism. Untermeyer and other wealthy and influential Zionists whom he introduced to Scofield promoted and funded the latter’s career, including travel in Europe.”

On one of these European trips, Oxford University Press publisher Henry Frowde “expressed immediate interest” in Scofield’s project. According to a biography of Frowde, although the OUP publisher was “[n]ot demonstrative in his religious views, all his Christian life he was associated with brethren known as ‘Exclusive.’” The “Exclusive Brethren” refers to the group of Christian evangelicals that, in an 1848 split in the Plymouth Brethren, followed John Nelson Darby, the Anglo-Irish missionary generally considered to have been the most influential figure in the development of Christian Zionism, and a major influence on Scofield.

Scofield’s Legacy

Had the Scofield Bible never been published, American presidents influenced by Christian Zionism such as Truman, Johnson, Reagan and George W. Bush might have been less sympathetic to Israeli demands, and consequently more attentive to U.S. interests. Moreover, the American people could have been spared the pseudo-Christian rants of John Hagee, Pat Robertson and the late Jerry Falwell, not to mention the lucrative End Times Rapture “prophecy” peddled by Hal Lindsey and Tim LaHaye.

But it is the people of the Middle East who have been most affected by an expansionist Israel emboldened by the unswerving allegiance of Christian Zionists led to believe that Scofield’s words are God’s will. Not least among the many victims of the Scofield Bible are 5 million Palestinian refugees whose right to return is fervently opposed by America’s Zionized Christians. Thanks to their indoctrination by Scofield’s unholy book, they believe that Palestine belongs not to the Palestinians—many of whom are fellow Christians—but exclusively to “God’s chosen people.”

Maidhc Ó Cathail writes extensively on U.S. foreign policy and the Middle East. He is also the creator and editor of The Passionate Attachment blog, which focuses primarily on the U.S.-Israeli relationship.


30 Minutes of Truth

Must Watch! 30 Min.

Standing Armies You Fools!


The 2nd Amendment was destroyed by the Dick Act. If you do not know what that is, then you are “hoodwinked in the dark”. Arms had nothing to do with it, and Arms were not declared in the Amendment. What was declared was a Militia? Perhaps going back to its origin in the State Constitutions will give you a clue, as in those Constitutions, it was spelled out in a more “wordy fashion”. Stating that “Standing Armies are Corrupt and should not be kept up under Peacetime”.

It is there, where you can un-hoodwink yourself as to the purpose of the 2nd Amendment. It was to PREVENT WAR. Not allowing the Federal Government to have a “Standing Army”. Forcing the Federal Government to consult and rely on Citizens, should they ever wish to declare War. They were tied to that “Well Regulated Militia”.

The arguments for the Dick Act were that this Militia was useless, very few trained in it, nor armed it. In reality, that was the point from the beginning, as the Framers knew very well of the “Kings Guard” or “Standing Army of the King” that was used to start Wars, and that the “Right to Bear Arms” was no right at all, but a requirement in order to keep the Citizenry armed and trained for War. By taking away that “Standing Army” from the Federal Government, wars became difficult at best.   The Dick Act negated the “Militia” and set up 3 factions of forces fully armed and paid for training in, by Federal and State Governments. Unlike the 2nd Amendment, it was not ratified but simply passed.

Immediately the “Fear Mongering” came of the Government is gonna come and take your guns, in order to get the populace to arm and train themselves at their own expense (just as it was in Jolly ol’ England) rather than forcing them to do it (by law as in England), hoodwinking was far more effective. Since the passing of the Dick Act, the Murder/Suicide/Gun Crime rates skyrocketed, and they have the populace now, from “cradle to grave” taught in Schools and in Mainstream Media, that the 2nd Amendment is SPECIFICALLY about what it is not. A declaration of their “Right to Bear Arms”, which it never was. That was an adoption (already in place) of the 1689 British Bill of Rights.

It was not declared. It was referred to, as it was already in place. What was being declared was the Militia, which was put in place to stop the Federal Government from having a “Standing Army”.

The real reason for the 2nd Amendment



Enough is Enough w/Facebook!

facebook and me

It was supposed to be Free Social Media

At one time it was.  There never was any good reason for their “Community Standards” as you could simply block anyone you wanted to.  Removing Pornography or excessive Violence, frightening images, might be reasonable.

Yet it has moved on from there into SUPPRESSION and with a certain “Zionist Slant”, getting worse and worse to the point where they are removing accounts, shutting down Groups and Pages, and marking as “Spam” when you even comment or share a link.

As they have done with other accounts of mine, they started right away (with my newest account) marking stuff as spam, and then suspending me for a time, even after they deemed that my posts marked as “Spam” were not spam.  Still, they did not take away the suspension.

Less than 2 days out of suspension, for that which I should have never been suspended for in the first place, they are upset with me joining so many “Truth Groups”, that they demand a photo of me for:

Security Purposes


Who’s security might that be for?  Why should it matter?  It certainly would not be for MY security or that of any of my friends.  It just shows how much of a “Big Brother” role they have taken.  Suppression seems not enough for them.

The entire premise of the Medium no longer makes sense.  Free Social Media.  It is not free when you are controlled and tracked.  It is not Social when people (your friends), nor you can post stuff without it being removed or your being punished for posting it.

There is nothing in my, or my friend’s interest involving their “Security Checks”.

I have done as best I could there to expose Truth.  Truth on Nikola Tesla and Alternative Energy.  Politics.  History.  I have built some pretty massive and well-followed groups over 9 years of participation.  Yet I am not going through the hoops anymore.

I see the future of this “Social Medium” going down the drain, but not before they have caused plenty of harm to innocent people.  In ways of which I do not even wish to discuss.

I withdraw and will no longer play your game.

New Spot for Social Media Truth